Water conservation is very meaningful, water pollution tax should be levied


Water conservation is very meaningful. Water pollution tax should be levied.

Time: 2013-02-20







The Economic Daily’s in-depth discussion of water conservation is very meaningful. On February 18th, the Economic Daily published today’s financial version of the “Echo” column, “Monitoring Groundwater Pollution Like Monitoring PM2.5”, “to achieve comprehensive monitoring of typical groundwater pollution sources”. The author believes that monitoring is only an important basic work. To truly prevent water pollution and protect water resources, the collection of water pollution tax is an effective means currently available for selection.

Water pollution tax is an important environmental protection tax, and it is also a government regulation means to prevent water pollution. The Central Economic Work Conference held at the end of last year proposed to promote the reform of environmental protection tax including water pollution tax. The provisions of the Environmental Protection Law, which has been included in the legislative plan, are also revised to further clarify corporate responsibility and improve pollution prevention and other pollution systems.

According to the principle of “who pollutes and who pays taxes”, the taxpayer of water pollution tax should be the enterprises, public institutions and individuals engaged in pollutant discharge. The tax rate design should implement a differential tax rate according to the characteristics of sewage discharge. The tax rate with a large degree of harm to sewage discharge should be stepwise and significantly higher than the tax rate with a small degree of harm. In order to reflect the effect of taxation, water resources tax to solve the problem of water shortage can be added as a package.

In the implementation of water pollution tax, industrial sewage can be selected as the object of taxation. After the conditions are mature, the scope of taxation of water pollution tax will be further expanded. At the same time, the water pollution tax can be based on the principle of “special funds only”, and the tax should be used as a special fund for the government, all for the treatment of pollution. In this way, a virtuous cycle of preventing water pollution and protecting water resources will be formed.


'Water conservation is very meaningful, water pollution tax should be levied

Second Grade Silicon Carbide

Second Grade Silicon Carbide,Silicon Carbide For Deoxidizer,Powder Silicon Carbide,Silicon Carbide Abrasive

ningxia hexing carbon based materials co.ltd , http://www.hexingsicmanufacture.com

Posted on